Jonathan Noble

Watches added to F1 jewelery ban as drivers risk $265,000 fine

As part of a safety push by the FIA ​​to prevent injuries in the event of accidents and especially fires, drivers have been instructed to remove all jewelery from this weekend’s Miami Grand Prix.

Seven-time champion Lewis Hamilton has, however, been given a two-race exemption from full compliance with the regulations as some of his jewelery items cannot be easily taken out.

Ahead of qualifying day in Miami, the FIA ​​has issued a further clarification about its interpretation of the rules and made it clear that time pieces will also be viewed as part of the ban.

A note in the F1 race director event notes for the Miami GP said: “In the interest of safety, watches will be considered as jewellery.”

There has been no official document that explains the penalties that will be handed down if drivers break the rules, but sources have suggested that the stewards will use an escalator system for any breaches.

It is suggested that a first offense risks a $52,000 fine, while a persistent repeat offender could face up to a $265,000 (250,000 Euros) penalty and the potential loss of championship points if he is caught out for a third time.

Such an extreme financial sanction was one of the reasons why Haas F1 driver Kevin Magnussen said he ensured he fully complied with the rules and removed his wedding ring.

“I don’t want to pay the 250,000 Euro fine,” he said.

While Magnussen understands the safety reasons behind the FIA ​​move, he says that forcing drivers to remove symbolic items like wedding wings strayed into a territory that did not make him feel comfortable.

“I understand what they are they saying, but it is a wedding ring around your finger,” he said.

“I’ll take a little bit of extra burn on my finger to race in my wedding ring. And if something was going to happen, something bad, I would want to wear my wedding ring. It kind of feels bad to take it off .

“With something like that, like your wedding ring. Let us take that responsibility. There must be somehow to remove liability.”

Read Also:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.